Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

 
Advanced search

508 Posts in 116 Topics- by 767 Members - Latest Member: Maruno02




Links:
FurnitureDepots  -+-   Openports.info  -+-   .net chat
May 21, 2012, 04:35:12 am
QSDCHublist ForumQSDCHublistGeneral DiscussionTopic: New Rating Strategy For Hubs - Proposal
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: New Rating Strategy For Hubs - Proposal  (Read 7265 times)
The Architect
God
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Reputation: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 127


linuxphreakr@gmail.com messerschmitt123 mikhail_polenin
View Profile Email
« on: May 07, 2008, 02:25:31 am »
It figures that rating a hub probably is not the most accurate way when a user can choose different ratings. Why not answer a short survey?

I was thinking of a 3-table model, each with a maximum of 4 points, minimum of 0 points. Each has 5 answers, each "question" is actually a statement, and the user must tell us if it is true or not. Here is the model as I planned it:

Statement 1: This hub has sent me several Mass PMs which bother me very frequently:
   0: Strongly Agree
   1: Agree
   2: Sort of...
   3: Disagree
   4: This hub has never given me a single mass PM that was not significant or advertising some PPC page.

Statement 2: This hub gets spammed frequently and does not seem to have any idea how to protect itself.
   0: Strongly Agree
   1: Agree
   2: Sort of...
   3: Disagree
   4: This hub has never had PM spamming as far as I see. Neither have I ever seen its mainchat flooded.

Statement 3: This hub lets me download and search without strong limitations or requiring me to register.
   0: Strongly Disagree (This hub requires me to reg!!! Or it has a ridiculously high search and download limit!!!)
   1: Disagree (This hub is high in limit, beyond what is tolerable, but it doesn't require me to reg to search and download)
   2: Sort of (The limits are high, but tolerable)
   3: Agree (Limits are below 120 seconds per search)
   4: Strongly Agree (Limits are below 60 seconds per search! WHOO HOO!!!!!!)



Everyone but the hubowner would be allowed to take this survey. If this comes through, we might add capabilities so that only people registered on this forum may have access to comments and voting. That way, abuse is minimized. And, not only that, but only the users who give a damn about your hub would actually vote if the process is elongated like this Tongue

If find other statements to be important as well, let us know Wink
« Last Edit: May 07, 2008, 07:48:56 pm by The Architect » Logged
Pinger Developer, Forum Administrator, Clumsy Coordinator, Coffee Machine Repairman, and Proud Supporter of Cheese Products
seraphim
Newbie
*

Reputation: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2008, 07:44:40 pm »
lol...this is funnier then the rattings...
cool propousal sweetheart...
Logged
Nos non vires verto forsit per usura idem eadem idem quidam quaedam quedam quidam reputo nos adsuesco assuesco ut nos partum lemma.
daniela_polenin@qsdc.org
The Architect
God
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Reputation: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 127


linuxphreakr@gmail.com messerschmitt123 mikhail_polenin
View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2008, 03:51:44 pm »
Statement 4: Overall, I believe this hub is strongly unique and the community is friendly.
   0: Strongly Disagree
   1: Disagree
   2: Sort of...
   3: Agree
   4: Strongly Agree
Logged
Pinger Developer, Forum Administrator, Clumsy Coordinator, Coffee Machine Repairman, and Proud Supporter of Cheese Products
The Architect
God
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Reputation: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 127


linuxphreakr@gmail.com messerschmitt123 mikhail_polenin
View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2008, 04:56:23 am »
The new rating strategy has now started implementation in our hublist. This will be a new frontier and hopefully a way of more accurately depicting the way a hub rates.
Logged
Pinger Developer, Forum Administrator, Clumsy Coordinator, Coffee Machine Repairman, and Proud Supporter of Cheese Products
seraphim
Newbie
*

Reputation: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2008, 06:12:31 pm »
already able to vote with this strategy,,,
seems to work quite well...
great idea sweetheart,,,
Logged
Nos non vires verto forsit per usura idem eadem idem quidam quaedam quedam quidam reputo nos adsuesco assuesco ut nos partum lemma.
daniela_polenin@qsdc.org
The Architect
God
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Reputation: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 127


linuxphreakr@gmail.com messerschmitt123 mikhail_polenin
View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2008, 05:58:40 am »
Did you try it already? What do you think should improve it?
Logged
Pinger Developer, Forum Administrator, Clumsy Coordinator, Coffee Machine Repairman, and Proud Supporter of Cheese Products
seraphim
Newbie
*

Reputation: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2008, 11:12:44 am »
yeah i did tried it already...
voted 4 for our hubs,,,
well...yes...u could improve the questions...are little ambiguous...and u could add something like a little questions list near each hubs stats but with yes/no answers...guess that will help more in ratting an hub,,,
Logged
Nos non vires verto forsit per usura idem eadem idem quidam quaedam quedam quidam reputo nos adsuesco assuesco ut nos partum lemma.
daniela_polenin@qsdc.org
The Architect
God
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Reputation: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 127


linuxphreakr@gmail.com messerschmitt123 mikhail_polenin
View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2008, 06:03:06 pm »
What is meant, in this case, by ambiguous, Mrs. Big Words Person ?
Logged
Pinger Developer, Forum Administrator, Clumsy Coordinator, Coffee Machine Repairman, and Proud Supporter of Cheese Products
seraphim
Newbie
*

Reputation: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2008, 02:49:36 pm »
like being more direct..."Did this hub spamed PM or on joins ? A: yes / no...u seen those vids,,,not many people are smart...u need to do kids talk  here sweetheart...
Logged
Nos non vires verto forsit per usura idem eadem idem quidam quaedam quedam quidam reputo nos adsuesco assuesco ut nos partum lemma.
daniela_polenin@qsdc.org
The Architect
God
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Reputation: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 127


linuxphreakr@gmail.com messerschmitt123 mikhail_polenin
View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2008, 05:56:35 pm »
If they cannot answer a simple short survey that is their problem Tongue
Logged
Pinger Developer, Forum Administrator, Clumsy Coordinator, Coffee Machine Repairman, and Proud Supporter of Cheese Products
seraphim
Newbie
*

Reputation: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2008, 06:31:44 pm »
lol...grande problema...Cheesy
hub owners will start killing users and ops 4 wrong answers lol...
Logged
Nos non vires verto forsit per usura idem eadem idem quidam quaedam quedam quidam reputo nos adsuesco assuesco ut nos partum lemma.
daniela_polenin@qsdc.org
The Architect
God
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Reputation: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 127


linuxphreakr@gmail.com messerschmitt123 mikhail_polenin
View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2008, 03:43:41 am »
Those hubowners will be banned then. We dont need hubs forcing their users to vote a certain way... Since when was voting made for merely approval? What about disapproval? No one wants to face the truth that their hub, as well as the majority, sucks. Tongue
Logged
Pinger Developer, Forum Administrator, Clumsy Coordinator, Coffee Machine Repairman, and Proud Supporter of Cheese Products
seraphim
Newbie
*

Reputation: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2008, 04:38:57 am »
u tell ynhub hub owners that their hubs sucks and they will have heart attacks...
lol...
start banning them lol...most ynhubs i know have the voting PM thing , the mass message  PM and the mainchat spam...
wanna give u examples sweetheart ?
Logged
Nos non vires verto forsit per usura idem eadem idem quidam quaedam quedam quidam reputo nos adsuesco assuesco ut nos partum lemma.
daniela_polenin@qsdc.org
The Architect
God
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Reputation: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 127


linuxphreakr@gmail.com messerschmitt123 mikhail_polenin
View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2008, 04:45:28 am »
I don't ban hubs that suck. I ban hubs that cheat Tongue
Logged
Pinger Developer, Forum Administrator, Clumsy Coordinator, Coffee Machine Repairman, and Proud Supporter of Cheese Products
seraphim
Newbie
*

Reputation: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2008, 05:45:09 am »
ok...thats pinger's work...lol...
Logged
Nos non vires verto forsit per usura idem eadem idem quidam quaedam quedam quidam reputo nos adsuesco assuesco ut nos partum lemma.
daniela_polenin@qsdc.org
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
Print
QSDCHublist ForumQSDCHublistGeneral DiscussionTopic: New Rating Strategy For Hubs - Proposal « previous next »
Jump to:  

Theme orange-lt created by panic